The solution is scalable. Every appliance has its limitations concerning its throughput. When we propose an appliance to a customer, we ask about the current requirement and the requirements for the next five years. Then, we suggest to the client that we serve them for the following five-year requirement.

Some appliances support clustering. In the case of horizontal clustering, we can combine multiple appliances to enhance it.

We have 30-40 customers using this solution.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT has extensive coverage. 

I rate it as a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable. On a scale of one to ten for scalability, I give the solution an eight. We have three administrators using the solution and we have plans to acquire additional appliances.

The solution is scalable. The scalability can depend on the module that is installed.

I rate the scalability of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT an eight out of ten.

The technical team takes care of it. However, the networking team has a lot of Cisco experience and has been using Cisco for a long time. So I think they are very comfortable with Cisco. I know there are newer solutions like Palo Alto Check Point, but they understand Cisco and guarantee PCIe. We have approximately 10,000 users using the solution in our organization.

This is a scalable solution that I can apply to any rule I want.

We have approximately five hundred and fifty employees who are protected by this solution.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is scalable.

When we recently upgraded our network the scalability of the product became obvious. We're planning to add about 500 extra nodes throughout South America and we're able to scale the platform to be able to utilize the solutions.

The solution is pretty scalable. The throughput, however, depends on what kind of appliance you are buying. For example, you can have 50 Mbps to 40 Gbps of throughput. Currently, we are using 100 Mbps and, at a couple of smaller locations, we are using 50 Mbps of a throughput receiver.

We're implementing it across locations currently. We're implementing it on an enterprise level. We have close to around 15 major locations, wherein we are using it to align devices that are hosted in our data center or in our critical locations.

As we are still in the early stages, we do plan to continue to use the solution in the future.

In terms of scalability, I've not really had to look into it due to the fact that the devices we have are accurate for our purposes. I can't really say a lot about scalability because I've not had to. I'm sure they have got configurations where you can maybe put two or three together to scale it up if you need to.

Scalability-wise, I can see that Cisco is one of the leaders in IPS solutions. However, I cannot comment on it personally because I have not used products by other vendors for this use case.

We have many thousands of machines that are being monitoring by my team, cybersecurity. All of the production traffic goes through Sourcefire. Because of the performance issues, we are unable to use all of the features. For example, we cannot use the SSL policy or the AMP policy.

The solution is scalable and I think it can be integrated with some Cisco devices and other third party devices.

The solution is very scalable.

The scalability of this solution is good.

Scalability is something that Cisco has always cared about. There is no problem with it. For example, if you have one branch and you want to expand to two or three then it will work without any problems.

It's scalable. Sourcefire has a classic deployment model and you can scale up through the appliance if you need the same deployment so it's quite simple. It's quite scalable. We mostly work with mid-sized companies. 

Sourcefire Snort is the kind of software that is constantly running like 24/7,

This solution is scalable and reliable.

You can use it in a cluster for one PC or a cluster for two different data centers.