It's a rock-solid solution and we do a lot with it.

The solution's stability is hard to fault. It sits there and runs without fault. We have had a fair amount of power outages and we get some very dirty power to our site. So there are brownouts and things like that and they cut off at a moment's notice and then come back and there are no configuration issues typically. We are generally quite happy with the stability that we get from the solution.

It has been pretty stable. The deployment is the SNC which is located in our headquarters. Then, you have collectors and sensors which are sitting out there in our various eye pop points: East and West points out the door. The sensor sits on the standpoint, therefore it sees everything. The collector, you point to it, and it has been pretty stable in that regard. 

Previously, the one thing which drove us crazy about the product was it seemed to be pretty locked on certain versions of Java. Now, it appears to have been improved. Thus, we are very happy with that.

In terms of improvement overall, we would like to see less reliance on Java and possibly a self-contained REST API package, either client or web-based would be nice rather than locally in Java. This would be a nice feature set.

Integration would be nice too. We are a pretty big Cisco shop. From ICE to our WCs. We are growing while we are looking at other products and solutions out there. Those solutions being FireEye or Palo Alto. Is there an integration where maybe East-West Lancope can see this type of traffic, then send updates and work lists with other products to say, "Block this as this is bad," other than the blocking point being Stealthwatch?

I understand Cisco has AMP Threat Grid. This is their ecosystem, and it is supposed to coordinate and work together in making the setup easy. 

Self-pushes to the cloud, as long as your Cisco-based products report to the same cloud point, then you are all sharing data that way. That is still very Cisco-centric. It would be nice to see a little bit more integration with Palo Alto, FireEye, and VScanner, therefore not all being Cisco-based.

The solution's stability is very good.

The solution is very stable.

StealthWatch is a stable product. I haven't seen a technology that could match it aside from the Chinese brand Huawei. Cisco is a US brand, so I haven't seen some of these products outside of this market. 

Who knows? Tomorrow, some company may build a newer, more stable solution, more stable one, but Cisco Stealthwatch has the most stable services today.

Stealthwatch seems to be rock solid.

The stability of the solution is fair.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics is extremely stable. I would give it a ten out of ten for stability.

There are no stability issues with the product.

We used to have an older version of the firmware and we were always having problems with it. Now, they have really good firmware. They came up with some new revision to the code, and so it's a lot more stable.

I have not been made aware of any stability issues with the tool. 

I would rate the stability as a seven out of ten.

The solution's very stable. Even through the upgrades after Cisco's acquisition, it has proved to be very stable.

We didn't notice any bugs or glitches. 

Stealthwatch is a very stable solution.

This solution is pretty stable for the most part. I don't like Java, so that's the thing that needs to go, but for the most part, it is a great solution.

This solution seems to be stable.

Stability is what we're looking for in production. Stability is everything.

The stability of the solution seems fine. It hasn't crashed yet.

We haven't had any stability issues so far, but we have only been running it for half a year.

No issues with stability.

The solution is very stable. 

In our environment, the way we've implemented in phases, the stability is good.

I would say that the stability of this solution could be better.

This solution is very stable.

The product is very stable. No problems at all.

It's stable now. I wouldn't say it was stable when we first had the solution, but now it's stable. In the beginning, we had the standard first-time turn-up stuff, like issues with the code, etc. We tried to give them a better solution to work with our company well. The way we have things set up is complicated.

As far as stability, we've never had a problem with Cisco Stealthwatch. We've had it for probably three years. It's time for an upgrade.

The solution has been stable. We haven't had issues with bugs and glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

So far we haven't had any issues with the stability of the solution. We haven't gone through a major upgrade cycle yet.

It has been pretty stable since we deployed it, and everything seems to be working fine.

I've never known it to go down or have availability issues.

It's stable.

It's very stable. 

Stability is really good. I don't think we ever had an issue with it.

It is stable.

The solution is very stable and we haven't had any crashes yet.

We are still running it but so far it has been really stable.

It is extremely stable. I haven't had a crash since installing it.

It was pretty stable. The only thing is the whole infrastructure is pretty complex with a lot of sensors and the like. With that level of complexity in mind, I would say it is very stable.

I haven't experienced any problems or downtime with Cisco Stealthwatch, so the stability is really good.

No issues.

The product is stable. We have not had any downtime with it.

The solution's stability is good.

This solution is very stable.

The performance of the Cisco Stealthwatch is good. We haven't encountered any issue regarding performance, or that it cannot handle all the traffic that it receives.

So far we've had a good experience with stability. We've run into some issues with the configuration. 

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

Yes. The version with the Dell server had iDRAC problems. Often, it reported iDRAC failure.

Cisco Stealthwatch is quite stable.

The stability of this solution is good.

No.

I haven't heard from my customers that they had any problems with stability.