Cisco UCS B-Series Pros and Cons
Cisco UCS B-Series Pros
reviewer1414053
Senior Principal Systems Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
The ratio in terms of the number of units and the number of servers that we can get each chassis is quite good.
View full review »reviewer1199268
Sr. Network Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Great security and functionality.
View full review »
Ricky Santos
System Administrator at ON Semiconductor Phils. Inc.
The Dashboard is quite impressive and is, so far, the best based on my experience.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Super Micro and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mikael Jensen
Sr. Operations Engineer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The stability provided by the product is its most valuable feature for our organization.
View full review »ARAVIND RANGA
VMware Administrator at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The most valuable feature is the service profile.
View full review »
Neeraj Mehra
Manager of Solutions and Support at Esconet Technologies Pvt Ltd
I can connect Cisco UCS B-Series to multiple chassis and rack servers using a unified platform, then manage them on a single console.
View full review »reviewer1365930
Network Security Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
The initial setup is simple, and not very complex.
View full review »reviewer1390341
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy.
View full review »Cisco UCS B-Series Cons
reviewer1414053
Senior Principal Systems Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
Cisco could improve the user-friendliness for less experienced users.
View full review »reviewer1199268
Sr. Network Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Integration with storage could be improved.
View full review »Ricky Santos
System Administrator at ON Semiconductor Phils. Inc.
There are patches that cannot be implemented without any downtime or reboot required.
View full review » Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Super Micro and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mikael Jensen
Sr. Operations Engineer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The management interface needs a lot of improvement. As it is right now, it's a pain to use. It's not user-friendly.
View full review »ARAVIND RANGA
VMware Administrator at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The configuration is a little bit complicated and could be made simpler.
View full review »Neeraj Mehra
Manager of Solutions and Support at Esconet Technologies Pvt Ltd
The configuration is a bit complex, as it requires very high technical expertise to apply it.
View full review »reviewer1365930
Network Security Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
The monitoring features and integration with other products can be improved.
View full review »reviewer1390341
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
The pricing could be less.
View full review » Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Super Micro and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Product Categories
Blade ServersPopular Comparisons
HPE Synergy
HPE BladeSystem
Dell PowerEdge M
Super Micro SuperBlade
Lenovo Flex System
HPE Superdome X
Fujitsu CX1000
Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Blade Servers Report and find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Super Micro, and more!
Quick Links