The solution is scalable. 

It is a scalable product.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

My company caters to the needs of two organizations that prefer to use Cisco UCS Director.

I would rate the scalability of this solution a six, on a scale of one to 10, with one being not scalable and 10 being super scalable. The reason for that is that the tool provides multi-cloud capabilities, but the UI is the version controlling. These can be a bottlenecks that prevents anyone from just going and consuming the full capability of the tool.

This solution is scalable, although it is not possible to scale the storage alone.

It is not easy to add or expand the product.

This solution is scalable.

There are approximately two thousand people using this solution.

The scalability is very good and it is flexible.

We don't have the need to grow too much or too fast. We're strictly west coast and there's not a lot we're doing to change that. So as far as personal experience with scaling, I wouldn't know too much. If we ever became a national global company, yeah, we'd probably use it and roll it out to scale up and I don't think there would be problems.

So far, we have not run into any scalability issues.

Scalability is amazing. As of now, it supports the open virtualization format, which is the format for VMware and vSphere. We have the virtual hard disk as a concept, which is the VHD. It works with Microsoft Hyper-V.

If you look at the ecosystem, you have better compatibility metrics. The only problem is that if I have an HP infrastructure already in place, I have to set it with external APIs to manage third-party solutions.

The solution is scalable.