We did it in-house.

We were supported by our partner both on the network side and the security side. Being a solution focused on the client, we involved the partner for support on the endpoints, which are the critical part of the delivery.

Our experience working with our partner was good because they know our organization and our needs. When you increase security, you may see a higher number of false positives. Our partner played a key role resolving any issues that arose for the customer during deployment.

We are using BT. I would define our experience with them as big trouble. It's in the name.

On our side, we have three to five people, but it depends on following the sun. We probably have five people worldwide who are supporting this solution.

We used an internal consultant.

It was just me taking care of its deployment. In terms of maintenance, once it's configured, unless you're retweaking and adding or removing something that was blocked, it pretty much runs itself.

We did it all by ourselves.

The implementation was completed in-house.

We implemented Cisco Umbrella through an in-house team.

We did it all ourselves. Cisco handled the back-end side with the portal itself, but the rest of it, we did ourselves.

We did it ourselves. The documentation was good. We're experienced architects and network-oriented guys, so for us, it was just a great experience doing it.

We deployed it ourselves with the help of a partner in France. The partner company is called Nomios, and we had a good experience with them. They know a lot of Cisco products, which is very good. They are into security and network architecture.

I used an integrator, Harness LLC, and the experience with them was all good.

I deployed it. It was pretty intuitive. I didn't have a consultant help me. I was able to implement the solution myself and manage it myself. That's a really good rating for an application. There are different systems you get to manage these days, and you can't have training on all of them. Because I rolled it out, I knew I rolled it out properly, and the system was working effectively. It was good. I liked using it.

Our Cisco partner helped us with the implementation.

It was deployed in-house.

We did it all by ourselves.

A basic setting can be done in minutes. If you want to go deep, it would take several hours. The solution's deployment time depends on how deep you want to go.

We received help from a local partner, NTT Global, during the deployment. They helped us set up Meraki and Umbrella. 

I performed the deployment myself.

Each environment has two people who are responsible for deployment. 

Our internal team and a partner both worked together to deploy Cisco Umbrella, and it did not take more than two weeks.

We worked with a Cisco partner, PCMD, who provided us with support.

We implemented this ourselves. We had the access points, set them up, tested them and shipped them out.

I sell it as a managed service provider. Therefore, the solution is installed for our clients. They don't have to worry about that aspect.

We deploy this solution for our clients because we sell it as a managed service.

We do all of our integrations in-house.

A vendor team was only needed for one small portion, which was setting up the virtual appliance. I would recommend trying to figure out the setting on your own first before reaching out to support. I found it very simple.

We did the implementation ourselves with some assistance from Cisco support. We didn't have any on-site engineer to do the deployment or implementation.

It only took two people for the installation process. I was on the network and phone system side and another colleague was installing the service on the Cisco Umbrella Solution.

We require four people who maintain Cisco Umbrella. 

We always implement for ourselves and for others in-house because of ease of use. Implementation-wise, companies should be aware that changing DNS forwarders might impact their global DNS operational needs. OpenDNS servers are also slower than something like Google DNS.

We are system integrators and we do the implementation ourselves for our customers.

Implementation was straightforward and was done in-house.

We have an in-house team and we provide support to our clients. We have a SOC with security and we provide clients with our expertise 24/7.

We (BMB company which is a Cisco Gold partner) are familiar with such solution and implementation. 

We are integrators ourselves, however, the initial setup is so straightforward, typically an in-house IT team can manage a setup.

We implemented it in-house.

An in-house team implemented it.

Implementation was a no-brainer. We do recommend notifying and educating users in advance of implementation to avoid potential headaches caused by sudden changes to filtering policies and such.

We had a consultant to assist with the deployment.

The only maintenance we do is we need to update the latest version through our version management software. We just update the agents on the endpoints.  

An in-house team implemented it; it was pretty straightforward. Just get the appropriate teams involved.

In-house implementation. I would recommend an automated procedure on a domain network instead of a manual remote install. I recommend a default of blocking malware, phishing and pornography only, and allowing the client to determine if any additional categories need to be blocked on their network.

It was self-implemented.

Setup and maintenance are done by our own team.

We implemented it in-house with the support of the vendor.