Cisco Web Security Appliance Room for Improvement

DanutAgache
Owner at Letris
There are some problems with this solution but it's not related to this product. If a user wants to use it for other devices like mobile or smartphones, this product isn't so reliable. If you want to implement it in a track point mode, it is difficult to implement and is not so reliable. There should be more implementation. View full review »
Usman Rasool
Department Head Data Center and Branch Netwrok at MIB
The licensing model needs to be more flexible. How it works is that you can have from zero to 499 users at the first stage, then from 500 to 999 users at stage two, and so on. They need to be more flexible because when you exceed 1,000 users then you are supposed to deploy a separate appliance to cater to them. The technical support could use some improvement. View full review »
Mohamed-Farrag
Network Security Engineer & Systems Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Technical support needs to be improved because they take a very long time and there is no communication or notification. Controlling engines at the network layer needs to handle more links or multiple links from the internet. Controlling with the applications, or more applications as part of the local applications so that it's bigger. The price should be moderated. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Trustwave and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1300410
Sr. Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
They need a better graphical interface, and they need a better ISE mechanism. In the next release, I would like to see the reporting features enhanced. View full review »
reviewer1006023
Network Security Team Leader
The price of this solution needs to be reduced. The FTD 21 model's Firepower Threat Defense does not have the multi-instance feature for the virtualization with the physical equipment. This makes it difficult to propose this solution to the customers. The issue that we are facing is, for example, if we have a project with a client, and we suggest the twenty-one series, we don't know until we have implemented it that we do not have the multi-instance feature. View full review »
Ayhan Tunc
Deputy General Manager at BTS Group
The pricing is too high, so that could be improved. Also, the solution is not very compatible with other products. View full review »
Yong Kwon Kim
Director at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
I would like to see management automation in the next release. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Trustwave and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.