Cisco Wireless Other Solutions Considered
Compared to other companies like Juniper, Aruba, and Extreme, Cisco APs tend to perform better.
View full review »LM
Lorenzo Mata
Network Engineer at County of victoria
We had looked at Meraki before, however, the cost is just astronomical. We're a local government, so there's no money. The cost of Cisco wireless controllers has always been kind of clunky. I had heard a lot of good things about Aruba, and then I heard they were bought out by HP, however, it seems like it's still good. I was leaning more towards Ruckus based on just how it handles traffic and handles the guest VLANs and that it can do SSI de-scheduling. I still need to go back and do an in-depth read on the Ruckus option. I am leaning towards that one, even though it seems like it's a close tie.
I also looked at Ubiquity, however, from what I've read, their hardware is not really up to par when you hit saturation, and on certain days of the week here, we definitely have saturated APs due to the fact that we have court cases. You can go from the usual 10 people on an AP to possibly 40 plus people, all trying to check their internet over the wireless. It gets kind of crazy on those days.
JM
Jhon Montoya
Engineer at Comunidad Cristiana Misioneros San Wenceslao
We looked at Meraki, however, we decided our organization was a bit too large for that particular solution. We prefer to have on-premises options.
I also test other solutions, for example, Aruba or Ubiquiti.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT
Ibrahima Thioub
Technology Manager at International School Of Dakar
For the first configuration, we used apple access points and the HP procurve and D'Link switches.
View full review »Cisco has collaborated with Meraki. Meraki products are much more economical than Cisco Wireless. Meraki’s interface is better. It’s a plug-and-play solution.
View full review »RR
RobiyantoRobi
Information Technology Infrastructure Team Lead at Saptaindra
PV
reviewer2223285
Data Communications Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
We evaluated Aruba and Fortinet products before choosing the solution. We chose it because of the stability and local support.
View full review »DP
Danya Philip
Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
As this solution is near its end-of-life, my company is looking into other solutions such as Aruba or Huawei. We have not decided yet on what we will do, however, the Cisco pricing is very costly. We would like to check out other options that are cheaper, and which can offer the same kind of stability and features.
IT
Ibrahima Thioub
Technology Manager at International School Of Dakar
I have evaluated other solutions, like Aruba through my nephew. This is the system he used at university in the US.
View full review »Aruba, Aerohive, Ruckus, UBNT, Mikrotik.
View full review »RR
Ravi Ramachandran
Senior Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Though cisco is our first choice, we have evaluated other options like Aruba and Ruckus.
View full review »LK
Luiz Kazan
Corporate Head of Digital Solutions Development Strategy | Smart Cities and 4.0 Industry at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
I have evaluated the Cisco Catalyst line solutions in the past.
View full review »YA
YaserAltwailey
Network Engineer at Saudi Customs
We've previously used Huawei and Aruba as well for wireless.
View full review »LT
Luis Adrián Acurio
Telecommunications Specialistde Telecomunicaciones at Telalca
I have evaluated Aruba Wireless in the past, they had some features Cisco does not that were useful.
View full review »RK
reviewer1650075
Operations Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have evaluated Aruba, D-Link, and Ruckus solutions.
View full review »AD
reviewer1447938
Chief of Systems at a mining and metals company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We did evaluate Aruba, which is from HP, before choosing this solution. The main reason why Cisco is better is the security model. They are easy to configure and have better technology. However, they are not as cheap a solution compared to others. We are currently evaluating Cisco ISE and are using the demo.
View full review »FS
FawziSIYOUCEF
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We evaluated other options for our client's needs. We evaluated solutions based on the client's budget and system requirements. In Nigeria, we need to take weather conditions into account. Our solution has to be temperature resistant. Cisco offers stable, portable, aerobics products.
View full review »When I joined this company they already had a modular for 6509 switches. So from there I migrated to a 5508 Controller. So at the time it was much easier, since the company was already are using a Cisco wireless controller. It would have been much easier for migration to the 5508.
We did talk to Aruba about their solution and, I think, price-wise it was very similar and that's the reason we stayed with Cisco.
View full review »CR
reviewer1516401
Telecom/Networking Analyst at a religious institution with 1,001-5,000 employees
I am currently evaluating other solutions to determine cost versus benefits. We don't need as many high-level features in our situation.
View full review »We compared it to Aruba which was our existing solution.
View full review »No, we stuck we Cisco since that's what we have been using all these years.
View full review »MP
Manideep Paul
Senior Technical Consultant at BT - British Telecom
All solutions in this market are more or less the same, it's just that Cisco is less cost-effective which is why we're currently testing HP. I've also worked on Aruba Access Points and HP switching systems and find them easier to configure and manage, while still providing good performance.
View full review »SS
Shrijendra Shakya
C.T.O at Sastra Network Solution Inc. Pvt. Ltd.
We previously evaluated Cambium and Rukus.
View full review »MO
Myo Thet Oo
Senior Operation Manager at ATG Systems
We also looked at Rocket Software.
View full review »I have compared it with some other products like Aruba and Aerohive to see what the functionality and performance are like. I have seen, for example, that the Aerohive already has some access points in the new 802.11ax. It's the new transmission technology that provides wireless bandwidth to 4 or 5 Gbps. I haven't seen any Cisco products like that, so I think they are a little late in this regard.
- Meraki
- SonicWALL
ND
Nabin Dev
CCIE, Sr. Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
HPE Aruba.
View full review »CR
Claudio Rosa
System Engineer at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
Yes, Aerohive and Aruba.
View full review »MK
reviewer1380057
Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
A long time ago, we were comparing this solution against Aruba before the acquisition to HP. We also compare other products however, the main competitor was Aruba.
View full review »- HP MSM 720 wireless controller.
- Aruba instant access points with built in controllers
We are bound to a supplier and therefore can choose from a limited number of vendors. We use Cisco for our wired equipment, it is then reasonably to first have a look a Cisco‘s wireless solution.
View full review »NM
reviewer1162332
Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Considering other solutions, I don't think Aruba is any better than Cisco. Aruba and Cisco both have a lot of range. Similarly, Ruckus also has this level of range; however, Ruckus is more specialized in wireless solutions. That's why for incoming projects, we have chosen Ruckus, which is more popular and easier to support as well.
View full review »YS
reviewer938022
Lead Presales at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
I have evaluated Oracle and Aruba solutions.
View full review »Motorola and Aruba.
View full review »SP
reviewer1593852
ICT Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
At that time, Cisco was the main provider of such solutions, so we went with Cisco.
View full review »VP
Vasantharaju P
Senior Manager at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
The shortlist was Aruba and Cisco. The features are more or less the same, but the cost is also important.
View full review »We evaluated Aruba, Ruckus, and Ubiquiti.
View full review »We did not evaluate anything else because Cisco is a brand name for networking devices.
View full review »We invited 6 vendors that offered Cisco, Juniper, Aerohive brand Wi-Fi solutions to evaluate and compare products.
View full review »Extreme Networks, HPE, Huawei.
View full review »Yes different WLAN Controller models.
View full review »PK
reviewer1448205
Information Technology Executive
Some of our customers use Cisco Wireless, whereas others use Aruba. It is normally an issue of the quality of the local support team. People prefer the support of one vendor over another, which differs depending on the locale.
View full review »No, it was the only one because all the network infrastructure is Cisco: Total compatibility.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.