Regarding pricing, while it's expensive, I can't comment on the exact ROI without a budget analysis. However, in terms of service quality, it's worth the price.

The firewall license is included by default, with no additional costs.

F5 BIG-IP is much more expensive than Citrix ADC. For example, If we choose two platforms, Citrix ADC, 3000 version, and we choose F5, F4200 version. F5 BIG-IP has connections, timers, and throughput similar to Citrix ADC, but the price is very expensive.

It is true that it is a bit pricey compared to newer technologies coming to the market. For example, A10 is a load balancer that does everything that Citrix can and it does a lot more than what NetScaler does when it comes to the security space, and their prices are so cheap. Every box comes with its own license and support built into it.

When you compare that with NetScaler, you have to buy licenses separately, you have to buy a support agreement that is going to be separate. A small NetScaler, even if it is a VPX which is a virtual server, could cost you close to $150,000 to $200,000 dollars. So the pricing is really high.

The pricing has to come down. They usually have three-year or five-year subscriptions. I sold one to a hospital and the model that they went with cost them $500,000. That's ridiculous. It doesn't have to be so expensive because then a lot of people shy away from buying it. Their budgets are not that huge and so they have to look for financing options. A10 comes with the licenses. I don't know if they can come up with a model that every NetScaler comes with its license. Maybe, depending on however many users people want to put on it, they can have a different type of license and it can be cheaper.

The solution offers subscription-based licenses. Price-wise, I feel that the solution is a little bit expensive. But it is really worth the money.

The licenses for this product are payable as a yearly subscription, and carry a high price-point. The subscription scheme is quite complicated, and costs will increase with each additional feature that is required, outside of the basic setup.

Also, if clients wish to move from an on-premises setup to the cloud-based version of the solution, the licenses are not transferable.

Licensing depends on your environment and the size and scale of the deployment. There are options to purchase a standard, advanced or premium license, each of which unlocks different feature sets and capabilities. We also have a throughput license that ties into that, whether it's 20, 100 or 200 megs. It really depends on the environment. If I look at competitors such as F5, the costs and functionalities we offer are the same but at a much-reduced cost.

For the specific use case that my customers primarily engage with, I would give the pricing a rating of seven out of ten. However, if you're exploring the full range of NetScaler's capabilities, my rating would drop to four out of ten.

I don't have any details in relation to the pricing. It's not an aspect of the solution that I take care of. 

After deployment, Citrix Netscaler shifted to a subscription-based license scheme for support, which is slightly more expensive. 

The solution is quite expensive. Regular security audits reveal frequent vulnerabilities, requiring monthly patches.

I'm not involved in licensing aspects of the solution and cannot speak to the exact cost of the product. 

There is only a licensing fee. There aren't any extra costs attached.

Citrix NetScaler's pricing is slightly above average but not overly expensive. I would consider F5 BIG IP to be the most expensive, Citrix NetScaler to be the second most expensive, and then Kemp Load Balancer to be the third.

The cost of the product depends on the customer's requirements, so there is no fixed price. There are multiple licensing models. There are no additional costs for using this product. It comes with a support bundle, and the licensing is subscription-based. It means that you have to pay on a yearly basis.

There isn't much of a difference between the cost of Citrix and that of other similar solutions.

There are the regular license costs and you also have to pay for licenses if you want more DPXs or whatever. A standard DPX is fairly cheap. It's around $7,000. 

Its price is comparable to others and affordable.

There is a licensing fee, and we pay it once a year.

We have a yearly licencing fee, and there are no additional costs.

It is an enterprise solution. Thus, its costs are reasonable.

You can do CapEx and then a yearly monthly fee, or you can do a subscription model, whether that's one month, month-to-month, or three-year subscription model. I give the solution an eight out of ten for pricing.

I give the price of the solution a seven out of ten.

The licensing is more expensive than others, and I rate it a seven out of ten.

The solution is undoubtedly very good, but it is expensive.

The solution offers quite good value for money. For the amount you pay, you get a fairly robust product.

It's an expensive product but it works well.

Citrix ADC could improve the price and make it less expensive, other competitors have a better prices. This would allow Citrix ADC to keep dominating the market.

It is very pricey, but we get it. If you need the best, money shouldn't be a problem.

We get value for money. Its price is fair. I don't think it is overpriced. 

I think the price is okay. 

You get the value for your money. There aren't any hidden fees. 

This product is more expensive than some of the competitors.

The license for Citrix NetScaler is on an annual basis and it is reasonably priced.

Our licensing fees including technical support are approximately $3,500 USD.

Citrix NetScaler VPX is not the cheapest solution out there, but you get what you pay for. There are also additional costs to the standard licensing fee.

Licensing is adequate. I wanted to have a more prominent license, but until I do they don't give enough support. The additional cost would be too much. 

If NetScaler is broken, we can open tickets very quickly and request shipment for the new unit or a spare part replacement.

It all depends on the features that will be used and the number of accesses. 

We have been evaluating F5, Citrix, and other ADC products. Citrix is the most expense of all of them.

The licensing costs for this solution vary depending on which model is being used. It comes in many different sizes and models. I think that the cost of support, or maintenance, might be in addition to the standard feeds.

There are costs in addition to the licensing fees, so the overall price can begin to add up.

Consider the sizing first before purchasing the appliance.

I recommend this product to customers because they have a ninety day free-trial period. This is a good solution for people who also have a budget constraint.

We have a five year platinum licensing agreement, which does not incur additional costs of any kind.

I do not have any experience with the pricing of the product. 

The client pays for the Citrix NetScaler license annually.

It's not for startups or SOHO.

We are quite happy with price. It's not too high.

For enterprise-level pricing, the cost isn't too high.

When compared to other solutions, the cost is high.

There are subscriptions for technical support available for an additional fee.

Costly product and complicated licensing.