Clarity SM Scalability
The solution is scalable to a point. Container architecture increases the scalability.
View full review »The solution is very well scalable. At the moment, we have around 55000 users in our organization. We have about 700+ technical executives to assist the end users using the service desk manager. Apart from that, the rest are all end users.
View full review »We have not had scalability issues. This system is capable of scaling to the largest enterprises. Conversely, it is overkill for small companies.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Clarity SM
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Clarity SM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AI
Ahmed Issawi
System Architect ITSM application at Michigan State University
With the new architecture that we have, scalability is a lot easier. The system's more adaptable now. We could drop in more servers if we need to, pretty easily.
View full review »Clarity SM is highly scalable.
We have approximately 400 analysts that log on to the system and make use of it. This includes both sides, from the customer and the service provider. We now have what we call self-service, it is for people who interact with the system for purposes of logging tickets using self-service. We have approximately 1,700 people using the self-service interface.
We are looking forward to onboarding more clients. We only have two clients but we would like one more.
View full review »There have not been any scalability issues.
View full review »It is pretty good. I have used it. Our company is like 10,000 employees. My previous company was approximately 100,000 employees, and it worked fine for both.
View full review »Scalability is quite good I think. Right now we are quite satisfied with the solution.
View full review »DF
reviewer977340
Project Manager at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
From my perspective, it is no problem to add on to this solution. I would say that it is very scalable. We have about 1,600 people who actively use it.
View full review »We have not had scalability issues.
View full review »The scalability is pretty good. We've introduced new environments, new remote offices, into it and are able to incorporate them with pretty small impact.
We have not had scalability issues.
View full review »It's scaled to our needs.
View full review »MM
Makhosonke-Matshoba
ESM Specialist at Gijima
The scalability is quite good. We are able to easily accommodate hundreds of analysts that that use the system simultaneously without any performance issues. You can increase it to thousands of users and easily incorporate other clients into the platform without really having to do a lot of work.
Our environment currently has about 450 analysts and 30,000 self-service employees. That means 30,000 people logging onto the system. In terms of USA, the number of employees that could be logged in at the same time at any given time could be around 500. But in total, we are servicing about 30,000 people who are using their self-service facility. The system has been able to handle that load without problems.
We plan to onboard all the new clients in their new CA Service Desk solution and we plan to increase usage in the future.
KD
Kris Dunn
Manager Software Engineer at Appriss
Scalability has been good. We've been able to add new servers when we need to and it's been performing well.
View full review »Scalability is very good. We have scaled to more users and more functionality.
View full review »GG
Gurinder Giran
Senior Consultant
Solution is scalable. It does work. We can modify it up better to make it the way we want it to work.
We use it for different clients and each client has a different number of analysts and different number of customers. I have seen some large scale implementations where they have over a 1000 people using it even in the country or outside of the country in multiple countries and even within small organizations as well.
We have implemented it for larger and smaller companies.
We had no scalability issues.
View full review »We have not had the need for scaling it. This product was configured in a way that we could use it for many years.
View full review »It is very scalable.
View full review »The tool allows us to adapt to many processes across our company. We have a lot of silos because of our business units. Therefore, the practices or the processes that we use to support our customers or the products differ, they're not all the same. It's very difficult when you have that many type of products to support, to make the business process for one product be the same for another. Fundamentally they might seem like they're the same, but they have all their very distinct differences. Escalation points and so on and so forth and Service Desk has allowed us to do that.
View full review »As far as tickets go, we probably have about 1300 a month, across at least 80,000 assets. We've got about 300 analysts, and for end users somewhere around 14-15,000. They're mostly just sales service. They enter their tickets and that's it. They don't go into the system a whole lot. As far as active users, probably about 300.
We had problems several years ago, but we upgraded and fixed some architectural parts of the systems.
MM
Makhosonke-Matshoba
ESM Specialist at Gijima
If properly deployed, I think that the CA Service Desk Manager is scalable. We had our own lessons to learn from the way we did things in the previous versions but with our latest deployment, it has been quite well and scalable.
Two of our enterprise clients have between 900 and 1,000 users.
View full review »It's scaled just fine.
View full review »It's scaled just fine.
View full review »It is a very scalable product and multi-tenancy feature allows you to give secure access in a multi-organizational environment, or provide services with it.
View full review »We have had no issues scaling it globally throughout our company.
View full review »We're not at that stage yet.
View full review »PC
Consult298936
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
There might be 20 people who use the solution directly. We have 100 people who use it daily.
The solution is scalable as you can add more front-end servers or more back-end servers. It's an easy process and it's not a complex thing to do it.
View full review »TS
Tomasz Szczesny
IT Administrator / Help Desk Platform at Inter Cars SA
We have more than 10,000 users using the system across 70 countries. It's quite scalable.
View full review »The scale that we currently use it at is more than sufficient. We have single server with a single database and it holds up very well for over two hundred users. I think it's doing pretty good.
v12.9 does allow us to be more scalable if we have to build it for a greater audience of users, but we haven't got that far yet.
We haven't tried to scale it yet, but I don't anticipate any issues.
View full review »TG
Reviewer2892
Vice President of Infrastructure Management at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
No issues.
View full review »There have been no issues with the scalability.
View full review »I think the issue, though, goes back to if you use the full functionality of SDM. So, we were on it for two years and we moved it over to the cloud. There were probably a lot of factors why we couldn't optimize SDM to its potential. It’s more of an organizational type of factor.
View full review »FB
Fernando Bruno Videla
Security Architect at Netnix
Our installation is very small but the customer's experience is good.
View full review »It's scalable.
View full review »I've seen it scale to very large organizations and do it well. They've made improvements to help with that scalability.
I encountered a scalability issue with an older version. Nowadays, it is better.
View full review »None of my clients have reported any scalability issues. I didn't find any such issues either.
View full review »There were no scalability issues, thus far. We have 28,000 users in the user database within the system, and it seems to chug along fine.
View full review »The scalability of the solution has been very good. We think that it could definitely grow with our organization, it's just a matter of dedicating the resources needed to actually get that accomplished. When we first started developing the tool and putting it out there, we didn't actually scale it appropriately where we needed to. For companies looking forward, the biggest hurdle I think they need to do is actually look at how much they plan to use of the tool initially and also gauge in the future how much they think they're going to grow and not over estimate or at the same time, underestimate the usage of it.
View full review »I think the solution is scalable. We just have not leveraged the scalability aspects of it, or the latest versioning of it.
LM
Lucas Mesquita
Information Technology Analyst at a consumer goods company with 10,001+ employees
There were no scalability issues.
View full review »None of my clients have reported any scalability issues, neither have I experienced any issues.
View full review »There have been no issues with scalability.
View full review »It can handle request of around 5000 concurrent end users in an optimum environment.
View full review »Scalability I think has done a reasonable job for us. We're at the beginning of setting up, we've about 15 workflows and we want to get to 30 or 40. It's not been that challenging for us to make that happen. What we've learned is that the tool can do what we want but you have to make the business process changes and to establish the workflows. Get in the process to finding people to work in the new way has been the real challenge.
View full review »The scalability is the best possible.
View full review »PC
Consult298936
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
There are no issues with the scalability. It is fully supported.
View full review »We have been able to utilize the system across all our different campuses. We find it to be fairly scalable, as far as bringing it up. We have not done HA yet, or any kind of high availability. That is something we are looking at as a possible future change. Right now, with our user base, we are pretty simple, but we find that it is scalable. It is something we are looking at in the future. Just not right now.
We have three different campuses, serving probably about 700 analysts, 40 different help desks, and about 70,000 possible customers.
In terms of scalability, I don't know if you can get integration. There have been complaints about integration with other tools. A lot of people wish that Service Desk had more of a REST API interface instead of SOAP. Some of our networking guys - we're trying to drive automation - and the enterprise, would like to see an easier way to interface with Service Desk.
The product does scale effectively up to a point. Beyond that, it gets a little complicated to extend it.
View full review »The tool can be load balanced and clustered, which makes it very scalable. The architecture can be designed to segment the Service Desk support team and the regular users. This is helpful as the Service Desk can continue to work efficiently when other users are experiencing performance degradation.
View full review »Scalability is great. We can use it in our company from our IT department to our sales department. It works for everyone.
The scalability is good. As far as it goes, we are not that big of a company, but it seems to do well for us in this area.
View full review »I can do whatever I want on it. I have it customized.
View full review »It gives the opportunity for growth. If you have more services and more users, you just keep growing and scaling the hardware and the software, and you still get the same response.
View full review »I have not encountered any scalability issues.
View full review »Recently since we've been doing more automation, there are some scalability issues there, just in terms of volume, transactions, and speed. End users have gotten notices that say, "Script running, do you want to continue?"
View full review »
Yes. Because features like Copy Linked Service did not work properly, services replicated at various levels of the hierarchy had to be simply copied, resulting in a maintenance nightmare when scaled to a significant number of services.
View full review »
Scalability is good. All I have to do is buy more licenses and I can scale up as big as I want - maybe stand up another server and get a bigger database - but I'm okay.
View full review »I don't know because it's the same as when I started using it a few years ago.
There were no scalability issues.
View full review »It's been able to scale for our needs.
View full review »So far, there were no identified scalability problems.
View full review »We have not had any scalability issues.
View full review »We are provisioning other clients in the platform, and it's scaled just fine for us.
View full review »It works well. We have lots of stores that call in. We have gone from 200 stores to 600 stores and it supports all of it.
View full review »I would say we're a small to middle-sized company, and we haven't had any issues with anything like that. I wouldn't say it's a problem for us at all.
The solution scales very well. A greatly improved version was introduced 3 years ago and since then, we have not had any issues with scalability or stability.
View full review »We have not really had any scalability issues. Rather, the companies are the ones that often do not have clear information about when they have to make the jump to a next level.
View full review »We are working on installing in the production environment.
View full review »Currently, we are busy migrating customers to use to Service Desk. We are going to scale up to about 4 to 5 million subscribers. This will allow us to further extend our look at network integration as well. It's going to extend far.
View full review »It is very scalable and very flexible.
View full review »I have not encountered any scalability issues.
View full review »We have not had any issues related to scalability.
View full review »There are some limitations, but it's used company wide, around 50-60 thousand users. We just need to upgrade because it gets overloaded.
View full review »We have not encountered any scalability issues.
View full review »We did not encounter any scalability issues.
View full review »It's scaled just fine for us.
View full review »I encountered issues with scalability. The solution is 32-bit.
View full review »We did have some scalability issues, but with fine-tuning, supported by CA support and the CA community, we resolved them.
View full review »It's scalable, but we try to control the number of users with licenses, which right now stands at 900.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »I did not encounter any scalability issues.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Clarity SM
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Clarity SM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.