InfoGPS was evaluated. There were a couple of other tools that were evaluated. It really got down to the fact that as an organization, Code42 had the features we were looking for. They offered a tried-and-true product. One that had come from a long pedigree. They understood the whole realm of data security and privacy. They had data and security privacy experts on staff, which were pretty good. That was very helpful.

The other tool that we evaluated was from Barracuda. It was primarily around the Barracuda backups. It was called Barracuda Backup Live or something like that. It was pretty cool, but it was limited in terms of the feature set that we were looking for. We did a proof of concept, and it took us longer to get that up to speed than Code42.

I wasn't directly involved in the evaluation of backup solutions, though I do know that we tested several including Symantec and Mozy. I'm sure there were others as well.

Mozy, Carbonite, Kaseya End Point Protection

Carbonite.

Yes, probably too many to list. The free options were overly labor-intensive or unreliable, and the other commercial options seemed topheavy or overly dependent on a certain server architecture.

There was another product on the table during Code42 evaluation, but I was not on the team at that time, so I cannot comment on this point.

No. CrashPlan was the clear industry leader and we decided that they were the best general match for our needs. Since we did not evaluate other options, there would not be much to add to this answer.

I did have the privilege of evaluating a potential competitor -- BackBlaze.The enterprise features were just not mature enough compared to CrashPlan.

Before choosing this product, we evaluated several: Retrospect, Carbonite, Baraccudaware, and Data Protection Manager. None were as flexible in architecture or pricing. CrashPlan's flexibility was the main selling point for us as we have some unique requirements.

Yes, we looked at Mozey and one other solution as well. We were moving from what had been the number one provider in this space for about a decade.

I have no information on this topic.

Before choosing this product, we did not evaluate other options. This is the one we looked at.

We looked at AWS and Druva as other options, but found them to be either annoyingly complex or too expensive for what we wanted.

It's been a long time but at this point, we haven't felt the need to reevaluate the market to find new options. We have also looked at services like Backblaze, and have used and liked them as well.

We looked at several different cloud based backups. There is a n article about the 5 best cloud based backups for nonprofits that helped with the decision.

Competitive endpoint security solutions that we also evaluated were Druva and SpiderOak.

This was really the only item on the market at the time that let us store the data in-house, but still back up devices securely over the internet.

• Lenovo Online Backup aka Mozy: This did not have the controls we were looking for. Price was similar. The administration was overly complex.
• Datacastle RED: Price-wise, this was the least expensive, but it also had the worst performance and least functionality.

We did not evaluate any other options. We liked what we saw with Code42 and knew it was what we needed.

We evaluated a few desktop software like carbonite, but they didn't have the functionality for the price that CrashPlan offers.

We moved away from a local disk and tape backup solution to Code42's CrashPlan. I looked at other cloud storage outfits and CrashPlan is the most personal and friendly company to work with. They are also one of the least expensive.

We tried out Mozy and Carbonite, but chose Crashplan because of it's feature list and simplicity. It just worked and worked well.

I used Metiix previously. It was essentially rebranded Crashplan software. It was effective much more expensive.

Yes, we looked at BackBlaze, upgrades to Retrospect, TimeMachine, and several other solutions. Nothing I found did as much, worked cross platform, worked while mobile, allowed me to use my existing hardware and fell in at the same price point.

We did not look at any other vendors. They gave us a trial and we even got it extended due to not having enough cycles to put it thru its paces. They let you know what the benefits are for using the cloud vs a hybrid solution.

We did not look at any other vendors. They gave us a trial and we even got it extended due to not having enough cycles to put it thru its paces. They let you know what the benefits are for using the cloud vs a hybrid solution.

No, I did not evaluate any other options. There were several associates that I know that were using this product and very highly recommended it.

Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options. We looked at Datto, but did not trial it. We did choose to go with Code42, as it showed great promise and had other possibilities available, such as the newest release can potentially help have data leakage prevention / notification from the administrative console.

No we didn't as Code42 is head and shoulders above the rest.

We took a look at Data Red Castle, Lenovo Online Backup v2 and also Acronis. We did a lengthy PoC of each and Code42 CrashPlan was the clear winner.

Yes, and we still use other systems for other purposes. Crashplan was purchased to fill a gap that the others weren't right for.

We didn't take the time to look at any other workstation backup solutions. We were so convinced about the security and effectiveness of CrashPlan, we started using it as soon as we got the demo!

No, we did not evaluate other options because it was either this product or our existing product. CrashPlan won by a mile.

Yes we did.

no

CrashPlan was recommended and I was already using it at home, so the decision was very fast and easy. It was the best solution by the time.

LiveBackup.

i remember they used evault on AIX servers and some of them still use it but when they change or migrate to windows , unix or linux crashplan is the best choice for them .

Yes, Carbonite.

Avamar, Mozy, Carbonite

I wasn't with the company at that time

No. CrashPlan was already well known among many of the IT employees. We knew what it was capable of and only had to test how it fit into our specific environment.

This was our first option and the only we tried at the time we decided to implement this kind of service.

We are satisfied with this software and I don't think we'll come along with other solution right now.

No.

Yes, we evaluated E-Vault as well as Druva.

Code42's CrashPlan has been implemented since before I started at my company. I'm not sure if there were any other contenders.

Yes, Druva.