Codenomicon Defensics Reviews

Filter by:Reset all filters
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Senior Lead Engineer - Product Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 30 2018

What is most valuable?

Whatever the test suit they give, it is intelligent. It will understand the protocol and it will generate the test cases based on the protocol: protocol, message sequence, protocol, message structure. That intelligence is very good. Because… more»

How has it helped my organization?

In our company, we have a lot of applications. A lot of protocols are used between embedded devices which are never tested for any abnormal behaviors. We have found multiple issues in our embedded system network protocols, related to buffer… more»

What needs improvement?

Sometimes, when we are testing embedded devices, when we trigger the test cases, the target will crash immediately. It is very difficult for us to identify the root cause of the crash because they do not provide sophisticated tools on the… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is a bit expensive.

What other advice do I have?

It depends on your company's needs. Codenomicon will only help to identify protocol implementation issues. If a company is using a standard stack, which is already tested, then I don't think they will hit any issues while doing fuzzy. The… more»
Sarath Kumar Choday
Real User
Senior Technical Lead at HCL Technologies
Jun 05 2019

What is most valuable?

The product is related to US usage with TLS contact fees, how more data center connections will help lower networking costs.

How has it helped my organization?

It tests for switches and router sections. We use it for product testing. We will get the license and then bring it back to the IT team.

What needs improvement?

Codenomicon Defensics should be more advanced for the testing sector. It should be somewhat easy and flexible to install. What I see in the documentation isn't that. Even if something doesn't malfunction, sometimes it is hard to install and… more»

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Nexus sometimes as an alternative to Codenomicon.

What other advice do I have?

We approve and even suggest the product to the people who are doing security testing because this product is far more easy to use. I would rate Codenomicon with an 8 to 9 out of ten. Unless these tests are passed, we will not go live… more»


User Assessments By Topic About Codenomicon Defensics

Find out what your peers are saying about Codenomicon, Synopsys, Spirent and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Codenomicon Defensics Questions

What is Codenomicon Defensics?

Defensics is a next-generation security testing platform that enables builders and users of technology to rapidly, reliably and efficiently find and correct dangerous errors and flaws. By proactively bringing the unknown into total view, Defensics sets the bar for superior vulnerability management.
Also known as
Codenomicon Defensics customers
Coriant, CERT-FI, Next Generation Networks
Download our free Application Security Report and find out what your peers are saying about Codenomicon, Synopsys, Spirent, and more!