Codenomicon Defensics Room for Improvement

it_user508521
Senior Lead Engineer - Product Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Sometimes, when we are testing embedded devices, when we trigger the test cases, the target will crash immediately. It is very difficult for us to identify the root cause of the crash because they do not provide sophisticated tools on the target side. They cover only the client-side application, and from that we can generate automated test cases, but what happens on the target device, what is the reason for the crash, for that we have to do manual debugging. They do not have diagnostic tools for the target side. Rather, they have them but they are very minimal and not very helpful. They can improve a lot on that. View full review »
Sarath Kumar Choday
Senior Technical Lead at HCL Technologies
Codenomicon Defensics should be more advanced for the testing sector. It should be somewhat easy and flexible to install. What I see in the documentation isn't that. Even if something doesn't malfunction, sometimes it is hard to install and execute. The product needs video documentation. This would help a lot more. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Codenomicon, Spirent, Veracode and others in Application Security. Updated: October 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email