In my experience, it is quite a stable product. Similar to Citrix, we typically do basic checks before implementing new features or patches. In terms of completing operations for customers, the continuity loss is less than 3%.

We have around 30 customers using it. 

I rate Cohesity DataProtect an eight out of ten for stability.

The cluster is stable.

I rate the product's stability an eight out of ten. 

The solution's stability is fine, and I haven't faced any downtime issues.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for stability.

The solution has been stable overall. There has been some issue with updates causing issues but they are resolved quickly.

It is a stable solution. However, we had some hardware trouble because when nodes get broken, or the disc is not good, it becomes a problem for us.

Generally, the solution is stable.

I have observed some stability issues when scaling the Pure Storage solution, and one of our customers who used it experienced some problems. However, I believe these issues were due to the solution being relatively new and possibly oversold in an environment without adequate hardware to support it. Overall, these issues were rare and isolated, and I have not seen similar problems with other customers.

Cohesity DataProtect is very stable. 

The stability is good. I'd rate it nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The stability is good.

The stability has been good. There aren't bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's quite reliable. 

I feel like it's very stable.

We are running with a full no-redundancy, so we can lose an entire node in the clustering and it will operate without any downtime.

I have not heard of any stability issues, such as bugs and glitches. My impression of the Cohesity DataProtect is that it is fairly stable.

With only one (self-inflicted) outage, I would say it is very stable. 

Stability-wise, so far so good.

The initial implementation requires a lot of babysitting and reporting on issues is a bit lacking. Hopefully, you've purchased a good support contract to help with those teething issues.

Overall, Cohesity has been very stable. We've had a few hiccups with some software releases, but have been able to get Support involved and resolve those in a timely manner.

We chose to go bleeding edge with the 6.0.0a release. We have encountered a few cluster crashes because of indexing on XFS file systems this should be fixed in 6.1.0

Stability-wise, Cohesity is moderate and needs more hardening.

The stability is absolutely rock solid. I'm not aware of any issues with file services and the backups have been 100%.  We have not had any file share outage or issues with SMB which is awesome as SMB fileshares were a critical part of decision to purchase Cohesty.

There have been bumps in the road, but overall the solution is working wonders in our environment. A 38-hour full backup has been reduced to a 10-hour full (it was only needed once) and then 45-minute incremental backups after that.

It is stable.

This is a stable solution. It is running by itself.

The overall stability has been consistent. The only noteworthy concern is related to the HANA aspect, which falls short of expectations. However, in terms of performance and support, there have been no issues.

It is a very stable product.  We don't have any problem with the solution at the moment.

This is a solid product. It's quite stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We've never had a problem with stability.

This solution is very stable. Upgrades are easy and do not require downtime. Set and forget.

No issues.

DataProtect is very stable. We haven't seen any great problems with the platform.

Cohesity's stability is very good. We haven't had any major issues with that.

No issues.

It has been rock solid!

There were some initial issues with network setup and discovery. Also, registering MSSQL agents came up with a few errors that I had to work with support on.

No.

I rate Cohesity DataProtect an eight out of ten for stability.

One of our Cohesity nodes apparently partitioned itself off from all the other nodes.
We have a five-node cluster, and that was preventing one of our SQL backups from running; it sat there for roughly two days in this partition state. Then, just as suddenly as it partitioned itself, two days later it unpartitioned itself, and the backup eventually completed. It took two days to back up what normally takes about 20 minutes.

Nobody's really been able to explain anything about that to me, other than that somehow a node partitioned itself away from the cluster. I don't know what that means, but yeah, it screwed us up for a few days.

It's relatively new, but it's growing rapidly, and their support team has been excellent when we've needed them.

The solution is stable. 

So far so good, I've never had any major issue, and deployment of the cluster was really easy.

No stability issues.

No

We've already had a power failure to the Cohesity cluster where a UPS went down. In our environment, we have 2 UPSs (an A-side and a B-side) ... we lost the A-Side, but because the Cohesity chassis has dual power supplies that support the same power backplane in the chassis, all 3 nodes of our cluster stayed up. The Cohesity cluster also has a call-home feature that generated a problem ticket with Cohesity support automatically, which emailed our team that a power supply issue had been detected.

Upgrades are also very easy; in a multi-node cluster, the upgrade process takes one node out at a time and upgrades it before moving on to the next node. No downtime required. 

We've had no downtime in the time it's been used. Some minor issues that we do get are resolved really quickly with support.

No issues.

I had hardware issues with one of the nodes before we went production but Cohesity quickly replaced it.

Sometimes new releases have a few bugs, but they are promptly fixed by the support team. Other than that, it is a fairly stable product.

The stability has been perfect.

No.

No.

No.