• Home
  • 3SL Cradle vs. OpenText Dimensions RM

3SL Cradle vs OpenText Dimensions RM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
3SL Logo

3SL Cradle

Read 2 3SL Cradle reviews
453 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

OpenText Dimensions RM

304 views|215 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and OpenText Dimensions RM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Siegmar-Schuenke
Flexible solution that manages all your needs
Use OpenText Dimensions RM?
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about 3SL Cradle?
Top Answer:3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
What needs improvement with 3SL Cradle?
Top Answer:3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities. In the next release, I would like 3SL Cradle to be 100% accessible in a web browser.
What is your primary use case for 3SL Cradle?
Top Answer:I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
11th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
453
Comparisons
308
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
304
Comparisons
215
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cradle
Micro Focus Dimensions RM, Serena Dimensions RM
Learn More
3SL
OpenText
Overview

Cradle is a requirements management and systems engineering tool that integrates your entire project lifecycle in one, massively scalable, integrated, multi-user product.

Dimensions RM is a full-featured and proven web-based requirements management solution that improves the definition, management and reuse of requirements, increases visibility and collaboration across all stakeholders, and provides real end-to-end traceability from initial ideas to deliverables.

Sample Customers
NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP), MdPnP.org
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Transportation Company11%
Marketing Services Firm8%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise76%
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while OpenText Dimensions RM is ranked 12th in Application Requirements Management. 3SL Cradle is rated 9.0, while OpenText Dimensions RM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira, whereas OpenText Dimensions RM is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.