3SL Cradle vs IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
3SL Logo
453 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
4,787 views|1,530 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."

More 3SL Cradle Pros →

"The most valuable features are the baselines and links.""The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually.""My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive.""There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project.""The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The traceability matrix helps to view things better. It comes with different linking rules.""One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules.""As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary.""It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install."

More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Pros →

Cons
"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."

More 3SL Cradle Cons →

"It does have a tendency to condense the requirements. It kind of puts them in a tree format. Sometimes those trees are a little difficult.""It offers a bad user experience and the usability is poor.""Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement.""The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools.""Be very careful how you load your DNG server. There are limits to the number of artifacts a server can handle.""As a web tool, DNG can be difficult to use if the server is loaded or your network connection to it is saturated.""There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration.""I have come to the conclusion that if you are considering migrating from DOORS to DNG, don't! Instead of spending 100's to 1000's of hours doing migrations, invest those hours in a DXL programmer to make DOORS do what it isn't doing for you now."

More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You are going to need a beefy server and a fat network pipe to it in order to make DNG and its companion tools work well for users."
  • "The cost of maintenance is €20,000 to €30,000 ($22,000 to $33,000 USD) and there are no additional fees."
  • "Users can buy a three-year license for about 12,000 Euros."
  • "The price of this solution is very high, and it increases year after year."
  • "If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation."
  • More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
    Top Answer:3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities. In the next release, I would like 3SL Cradle to be 100% accessible in a web browser.
    Top Answer:I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
    Top Answer:My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive.
    Top Answer:I cannot discuss the product's price since it is meant to be confidential and kept between our company and IBM. If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational… more »
    Top Answer:IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product. From an improvement perspective, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation needs to be made a very user-friendly product.
    Ranking
    Views
    453
    Comparisons
    308
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    4,787
    Comparisons
    1,530
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    671
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cradle
    RDNG, Rational Requirements Composer and IBM RRC
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cradle is a requirements management and systems engineering tool that integrates your entire project lifecycle in one, massively scalable, integrated, multi-user product.

    IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation (DNG) is a web-based requirements management tool developed by IBM. It is designed to help organizations capture, manage, and trace requirements throughout the entire product development lifecycle. DNG is part of the IBM Rational solution suite and offers a range of features to support requirements management and collaboration among project teams.

    IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Features:

    • Requirements Capture and Management: DNG allows users to capture and organize requirements in a structured manner, providing a central repository for requirement artifacts.
    • Traceability and Impact Analysis: The tool enables traceability by establishing relationships between requirements, test cases, design artifacts, and other project artifacts. This allows users to analyze the impact of changes and ensure requirements coverage.
    • Collaboration and Review: DNG facilitates collaboration among stakeholders by providing features for discussion, commenting, and reviewing requirements. It allows teams to collaborate in real-time and provides a historical record of discussions.
    • Change Management and Version Control: DNG supports change management by tracking requirement changes, maintaining version history, and providing capabilities for managing baselines and variants.
    • Reporting and Analytics: The tool offers reporting and analytics capabilities to generate custom reports, track project progress, monitor requirements coverage, and gain insights into project metrics.
    • Integration and Open APIs: DNG supports integration with other tools and systems commonly used in the software development lifecycle. It provides open APIs that allow organizations to integrate DNG with their existing toolchain and processes.

    IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Benefits:

    • Centralized Requirements Management: DNG provides a central repository for managing requirements, ensuring a single source of truth and promoting consistency and clarity across the organization.
    • Improved Collaboration and Communication: The tool facilitates collaboration and communication among stakeholders, allowing teams to work together effectively, address conflicts, and align on requirements.
    • Enhanced Traceability and Compliance: DNG enables traceability between requirements and other project artifacts, supporting compliance with industry standards, regulations, and quality frameworks.
    • Efficient Change Management: With DNG, teams can effectively manage changes to requirements, track version history, and analyze the impact of changes on the project.
    • Increased Productivity and Efficiency: The tool automates manual tasks, provides workflow support, and offers streamlined collaboration features, improving productivity and efficiency in requirements management.
    • Reporting and Decision-Making: DNG's reporting and analytics capabilities provide stakeholders with valuable insights into project status, progress, and metrics, enabling informed decision-making.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Hubert Zenner, Technical Sales Specialist at a computer software company, says that "IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."

    Kapil Raikar, Senior Manager – Development, PD and Data Virtulization at a computer software company, states that "There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project."

    Roger Trackwell, System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler,

    Sample Customers
    NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
    Major health insurer
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Wholesaler/Distributor10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Requirements Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is ranked 4th in Application Requirements Management with 12 reviews. 3SL Cradle is rated 9.0, while IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation writes "An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements". 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira, whereas IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Jira, Polarion Requirements and Helix ALM.

    See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

    We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.