• Home
  • 3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational Focal Point

3SL Cradle vs IBM Rational Focal Point comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
3SL Logo

3SL Cradle

Read 2 3SL Cradle reviews
453 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo

IBM Rational Focal Point

97 views|57 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and IBM Rational Focal Point based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Siegmar-Schuenke
Flexible solution that manages all your needs
Use IBM Rational Focal Point?
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about 3SL Cradle?
Top Answer:3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
What needs improvement with 3SL Cradle?
Top Answer:3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities. In the next release, I would like 3SL Cradle to be 100% accessible in a web browser.
What is your primary use case for 3SL Cradle?
Top Answer:I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
11th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
453
Comparisons
308
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
97
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cradle
Rational Focal Point
Learn More
3SL
IBM
Overview

Cradle is a requirements management and systems engineering tool that integrates your entire project lifecycle in one, massively scalable, integrated, multi-user product.

IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.
Sample Customers
NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 14th in Application Requirements Management. 3SL Cradle is rated 9.0, while IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira, whereas IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.