We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 10th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. 3SL Cradle is rated 9.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer and Jira.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.