Compare A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Citrix ADC

A10 Networks Lightning ADC is ranked 17th in Application Delivery Controllers while Citrix ADC is ranked 2nd in Application Delivery Controllers with 18 reviews. A10 Networks Lightning ADC is rated 0, while Citrix ADC is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix ADC writes "Has the ability to turn on features without owning a license to test them out and use for a while ". A10 Networks Lightning ADC is most compared with A10 Networks Thunder ADC, HAProxy , Kemp LoadMaster and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, whereas Citrix ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy , NGINX Plus, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
A10 Networks Lightning ADC Logo
337 views|285 comparisons
Citrix ADC Logo
16,832 views|12,492 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use A10 Networks Lightning ADC? Share your opinion.
Kumar Murugesan
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: July 2020.
430,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
When compared to other solutions, the cost is high.Our licensing fees including technical support are approximately $3,500 USD.The licensing costs for this solution vary depending on which model is being used.Citrix NetScaler VPX is not the cheapest solution out there, but you get what you pay for.We have a yearly licencing fee, and there are no additional costs.Ninety day free trial makes it easy to try out this solution.Licensing is adequate. I wanted to have a more prominent license, but until I do they don't give enough support. The additional cost would be too much.NetScaler does the same thing as an F5 and it's cheaper.

More Citrix ADC Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
430,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
337
Comparisons
285
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
16,832
Comparisons
12,492
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
401
Avg. Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Lightning ADSNetScaler, Citrix NetScaler VPX
Learn
A10 Networks
Citrix
Overview

A cloud-native, software-defined solution that provides integrated advanced load-balancing, performance optimization, application security and per-application analytics to increase operational agility and application performance.

Citrix ADC is an application delivery controller (ADC) that accelerates application performance, enhances application availability with advanced L4-7 load balancing, secures mission-critical apps from attacks and lowers server expenses by offloading computationally intensive tasks.

Offer
Learn more about A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Learn more about Citrix ADC
Sample Customers
Handle FinancialABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Healthcare Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company7%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: July 2020.
430,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.