Compare ADTRAN NetVanta vs. Aastra 5000
Ranking  | |
Views 37 Comparisons 16 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 90 Comparisons 69 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 100% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| NetVanta | |
Learn | |
| Mitel | ADTRAN |
Overview | |
| Aastra 5000 is one of the most comprehensive communication software on the market, with over 500 functions. | Adtran NetVanta Series is a comprehensive portfolio of enterprise-class networking equipment designed to lower costs in your network without compromising performance or reliability. These solutions address bandwidth expansion, VoIP migration, and network security. Support for small and Medium Enterprise deployments. The NetVanta portfolio includes: Fast Ethernet switches, Gigabit Ethernet switches Power over Ethernet Switches, Integrated switch-routers, Fixed port Routers, Modular Routers, Multiservice Access Routers, Internet security/firewall appliance, IP Business Gateways, IP Communication Platforms, IP Phones, Integrated Access Devices, 802.11a/b/g Wireless Access Points and Network Management. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Aastra 5000 | Learn more about ADTRAN NetVanta |
Sample Customers | |
| AIPA SpA | Hamilton Heights School Corporation, Bissinger's Handcrafted Chocolatier, Warren County Water District |
Aastra 5000 is ranked 24th in Unified Communications while ADTRAN NetVanta is ranked 19th in Unified Communications. Aastra 5000 is rated 0.0, while ADTRAN NetVanta is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aastra 5000 is most compared with , whereas ADTRAN NetVanta is most compared with Huawei SoftCo.
See our list of best Unified Communications vendors and best IP Telephony & Unified Communications vendors.
We monitor all Unified Communications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.