We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Cloud Data Integration is Pushback. You are able to push the data to the solution itself, and it can handle the queries. It helps us a lot. With other tools, the burden is kept on the server."
"The solution provides increased efficiency while still being user-friendly and easy to operate."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"The solution is straightforward."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"It has all the advantages of the Cloud in that you can use it without worrying about infrastructure, upkeep, or upgrades."
"The program is stable and scalable."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"With the solution, we had some issues, and we have every day, and we used to open a ticket. Sometimes, there are data issues and transformation issues."
"Its features for partitioning and optimization could be better."
"We would like to have accessibility to the repository."
"I have received feedback from certain teams and there is a steep learning curve to use this solution."
"While my company operates on the cloud, we have seen that Informatica Cloud Data Integration has some performance issues causing it to lag."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration can improve by being more user-friendly. When you're working with the solution a lot of technical knowledge is required. It's not a solution that anyone can use properly, you need knowledge of what's happening at the back end, such as SQL. When you get stuck, you need to look into your logic. For other tools, such as Dell Boomi, anyone can use them."
"One area that needs to improve is the user experience because it is very complex. The trial version is very complex so it's not easy to start using the program immediately. You must study the rules first."
"The vendor should have more training resources: online classes, free tutorial videos, etc."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 28th in Data Integration with 2 reviews while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "High performance and flexible solution for companies with large amounts of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, AWS Glue, Talend Data Management Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform. See our Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.