We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and INTELLIBOT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ABBYY Vantage is user-friendly...The deployment process can be done in a few minutes."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY Vantage is flexibility. You are able to edit at a granular level providing good control over the process. Additionally, the brochures and guides were helpful in learning the solution."
"We have found the solution to be stable so far."
"We are able to extract details from a PDF and put them into a CSV. It is able to extract the details that we are looking for. We have the Machine Learning feature to extract the data with respect to the position of the field."
"ABBYY Vantage has reduced our data because it can classify and extract information from documents."
"The solution's AI technology is genius."
"Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. You can also use AI to accomplish medium-complex tasks."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"There's a helpful community available through the portal."
"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."
"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."
"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."
"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."
"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."
"They should improve the RESTful API side of this solution. Currently, fully RESTful API is not available in the on-prem version, which is really a problem, and we have to work around this limitation. The cloud version already has a fully RESTful API, but the on-prem version doesn't have a fully RESTful API, which is a big mistake. It is easy to solve, but they aren't solving it quicker. They are taking a long time. Nowadays, most people don't go to the interface. They like to use RESTful API."
"In IRISXtract, we can have master data, and we can set the master data. There are more options for taking any data and comparing it with master data. For a project, they have a dump from SAP for validation. This feature is there in ABBYY, but it is not extensive like IRISXtract. ABBYY is capturing the data, but there are not a lot of options to validate the captured data. It would be helpful if there are more options for validating the captured data in ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"The initial setup was relatively complex. The people who install it must be knowledgeable about what they are doing."
"There is always room for improvement in any product. Some of the configurations for the machine learning models for invoice reading are fairly complicated. There is so much customization that is possible with that sort of thing, so it makes sense that there are a lot of options, but some of the more important ones can be a little better streamlined or more upfront. Currently, machine learning models are a little bit difficult to configure satisfactorily."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"I think that technical support should help instead of developing a solution from scratch every time you reach out to them."
"I would like to see a machine learning model to make the solution more intelligent."
"The modelling, classification and handwritten information are not great."
"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."
"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."
"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."
"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."
"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."
"The trigger actions need to be more robust."
"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while INTELLIBOT is ranked 17th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while INTELLIBOT is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of INTELLIBOT writes "Great studio, offers easy access for clients, and has a helpful community for troubleshooting". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, HyperScience and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas INTELLIBOT is most compared with UiPath. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. INTELLIBOT report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.