We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The handwriting recognition is very good, as it can recognize handwriting done with pen and paper with at least 70% accuracy."
"Compared to other tools, ABBYY Vantage is better because it's very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY Vantage is flexibility. You are able to edit at a granular level providing good control over the process. Additionally, the brochures and guides were helpful in learning the solution."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"We have found the solution to be stable so far."
"The ability to extract and insert data, then structuralize it into the actionable format, would be the most valuable."
"Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. You can also use AI to accomplish medium-complex tasks."
"Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"The good stuff about IBM is the fact that it's very easy to use, there are very nice and smart AI tools within the licensing that you don't have to pay any access. Moreover, it's more precise and more secure."
"It is easy to use. We have enabled our resources who don't have a background in automation to be certified and trained, then implement this product within a very short period of time, as it is very user-friendly."
"I like the integration with Watson and the possibility to have an intelligent reading of all the customers' documents."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"It's integrated with all the other products within the Salesforce ecosystem."
"The solution is scalability."
"The solution’s performance is good."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"There is an area of improvement. For example, when we read the data from the OCR, the accuracy is not good."
"Their tutorials are not enough. They can improve the tutorials and maybe add more examples in their tutorials. Currently, if you want to learn ABBYY technology, it is very difficult. There are just a few resources, such as YouTube channels and blogs. There are not many resources for learning ABBYY."
"Programming interfaces should include intelligence or documentation."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve in the maintenance, and there are some issues. You have to make efforts to do corrections. Additionally, it could be more user-friendly in terms of connecting between different solutions."
"Initially, it was good, but now, in terms of ease of implementation and accuracy, there are better competitors in the market. What we are seeing in some of the other tools isn't there in ABBYY. They have to improve it to include such features. Otherwise, it will be difficult for them to compete in the market."
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve the performance. We are looking for better performance because it can be a lengthy capture process and the accuracy needs to be enhanced when it comes to Arabic."
"Customization in the solution needs to be modified. In the future, I would like to see the product have better customization functionality."
"We would like a decreased need for customer support."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation should be more stable."
"Capturing GUI operations is very easy, but capturing IBM Logistics automation is hard. It does not always work with browsers or automotive applications like SAP."
"The time it takes for approvals, and risk analysis could be faster."
"The product's document readers must be improved to capture the data well."
"I would like it to do pretty much everything out-of-the-box without any need for any customization. However, that is not the case right now. We absolutely have to do some amount of customization with the solution in order to use it out-of-the-box as-is."
"The scalability of the solution can be challenging."
"I would like to improve the efficiency of this solution and the Surface Level Agreement."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 23 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "User-friendly interface and good stability". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, HyperScience and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Blue Prism. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
