We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Microsoft Power Automate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ABBYY Vantage is user-friendly...The deployment process can be done in a few minutes."
"The solution's technical support is very supportive."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale for big processes. We are able to process 1 million pages a day. Its accuracy is also very nice. It is a good feature that they have. It is an independent platform, which is its biggest advantage as compared to other solutions. It is also very stable and powerful. It is 100% on time."
"It's easy to use."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It is easy to use and configure."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY FlexiCapture is the ability to create your own template on the fly. You can train and classify, you can work with those different templates without the need to do special programming for it or with minimum programming. Additionally, the solution is supporting the Arabic OCR, both of these combined features are the most important for us in the Egyptian market."
"I like that it has the capability of processing a high volume of documents with great accuracy."
"ABBYY Vantage has reduced our data because it can classify and extract information from documents."
"This solution improved the reporting in our organization. The financial department was doing a lot of copy pasting from different sources to create financial reports. Through ProcessRobot, we were able to automate all those copy pasting and produce all those financial reports overnight."
"WinAutomation is very handy to use, and it has the power to interact with multiple systems, such as SAP, Oracle, or .NET systems."
"It servers our purposes in bringing together all types of applications, being able to automate them with the right intelligent output from the data that we plugin."
"The most valuable features are that it is low-code and simple."
"The solution helps automate manual tasks and interacts with multiple applications."
"The solution is pretty customizable. Even big automation tasks are done rather simply."
"The development time for ProcessRobot is very good compared to other solutions."
"Good core applications."
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"The recognition intelligence could improve by having more details in the documents. There are limitations with the forms, templates, and manuscripts."
"There are certain controls like radio buttons and checkboxes that when reading PDFs, really doesn't go well with the RPA."
"I would like to see a machine learning model to make the solution more intelligent."
"ABBYY's support model could be improved because we get some complaints from customers regarding the amount of time it takes and the kind of responses we get. They also need to improve their professional services team and train them to support customers better during custom implementations."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"Initially, it was good, but now, in terms of ease of implementation and accuracy, there are better competitors in the market. What we are seeing in some of the other tools isn't there in ABBYY. They have to improve it to include such features. Otherwise, it will be difficult for them to compete in the market."
"The solution lacks maturity."
"I've had issues with reordering columns. When I tried to do it, it seemed to take a long time, and then, later, it gave me some kind of error."
"I had some experience in the past with the solution having some difficulties with large loads, it is already better but it could still be improved."
"They can build more templates and more connectivity with other platforms. They can provide a more user-friendly way to connect with other platforms. They have their own in-built plugins for certain third-party vendors, but there are still a lot of third-party vendors that are not there."
"This solution should be more resilient, with robots more capable of recovering after an error."
"Power Automate is too complicated - it forces you to go through extra tasks instead of streamlining your workflow."
"They can provide a deeper level of feedback about running processes. When I compare it to Blue Prism, the control room has slightly less information about the running processes and possible errors. I'm not a pro, so I am not entirely sure if this is a core feature of the product or if it is because of the way our partners have developed it or set it up."
"We are looking to see more features implemented there are already available in UiPath or Automation Anywhere."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while Microsoft Power Automate is ranked 2nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 123 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Automate is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Automate writes "Provides valuable integration with other Microsoft tools". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, OpenText Intelligent Capture and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas Microsoft Power Automate is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Microsoft Power Automate report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
