We performed a comparison between Kiteworks and XM SendSecure [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).Earn 20 points
Kiteworks is ranked 6th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 12 reviews while XM SendSecure [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Kiteworks is rated 8.8, while XM SendSecure [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Kiteworks writes "A unified, secure way to share sensitive content, with no file size limitations". On the other hand, Kiteworks is most compared with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, MOVEit, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, SharePoint and Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense, whereas XM SendSecure [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.