Compare Accept360 vs. IBM Rational Focal Point

Accept360 is ranked 15th in Application Requirements Management while IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 16th in Application Requirements Management. Accept360 is rated 0, while IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0. On the other hand, Accept360 is most compared with CA Agile Requirements Designer, whereas IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with JIRA.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Accept360 Logo
160 views|111 comparisons
IBM Rational Focal Point Logo
156 views|99 comparisons
Ranking
Views
160
Comparisons
111
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
156
Comparisons
99
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, CA (A Broadcom Company), IBM and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: December 2019.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Focal Point
Learn
Accept
IBM
Overview

Bringing the right products to market is hard enough. It doesn’t help when spreadsheets and slide decks remain your primary means for product planning. Things can get ugly in a hurry when you have to manage multiple products, globally dispersed teams, and thousands of intricate requirements, priorities, and dependencies.

IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.
Offer
Learn more about Accept360
Learn more about IBM Rational Focal Point
Sample Customers
Cadence, Ultimate Software, NVIDIA, McAfee, Visma, Epicor, Avira, Basware, TeklaSanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, CA (A Broadcom Company), IBM and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: December 2019.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.