• Home
  • Accept360 vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Accept360 vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Accept360 and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Accept360?
Edmund Suarez
Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable
Our customers require that we perform static analysis and have no critical high errors. We must also have 100 percent code coverage for my test to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
What needs improvement with Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
What is your primary use case for Parasoft Development Testing Platform?
Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
Ranking
16th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
40
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
100
Comparisons
77
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
217
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn More
Accept
Parasoft
Overview

Bringing the right products to market is hard enough. It doesn’t help when spreadsheets and slide decks remain your primary means for product planning. Things can get ugly in a hurry when you have to manage multiple products, globally dispersed teams, and thousands of intricate requirements, priorities, and dependencies.

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Sample Customers
Cadence, Ultimate Software, NVIDIA, McAfee, Visma, Epicor, Avira, Basware, Tekla
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Accept360 is ranked 16th in Application Requirements Management while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 10th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. Accept360 is rated 0.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Accept360 is most compared with , whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.