AccessData FTK [EOL] vs OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AccessData FTK is too expensive compared to EnCase."
  • More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In eDiscovery
    17th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    213
    Comparisons
    119
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AccessData Forensic Toolkit
    Catalyst e-Discovery
    Learn More
    Overview

    FTK is built for speed, stability and ease of use. It provides comprehensive processing and indexing up front, so filtering and searching is faster than with any other product. This means you can zero in on the relevant evidence quickly, dramatically increasing your analysis speed.

    Catalyst's E-discovery cloud platform provides an integrated repository for the heart of the litigation lifecycle - from processing through search, analytics, review and production. It provides a smarter way to manage cases, investigations and regulatory requests using the Catalyst's central, single- instance document repository. It provides an Automated Redaction that will assist reviewers in eliminating privileged and confidential information from case files and it reduces the need for reviewers to manually scour documents and tediously block-redact individual portions.
    Sample Customers
    Royal Military Police
    Major CERCLA lawsuit
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is ranked 17th in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is most compared with Actiance.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.