AccessData FTK [EOL] vs IBM eDiscovery Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Exterro Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
119 views|57 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and IBM eDiscovery Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Ivan Castaneda
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."

More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pros →

"Creating and running queries on the solution is very good."

More IBM eDiscovery Manager Pros →

Cons
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."

More AccessData FTK [EOL] Cons →

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

More IBM eDiscovery Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AccessData FTK is too expensive compared to EnCase."
  • More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In eDiscovery
    25th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    119
    Comparisons
    57
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AccessData Forensic Toolkit
    eDiscovery Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    FTK is built for speed, stability and ease of use. It provides comprehensive processing and indexing up front, so filtering and searching is faster than with any other product. This means you can zero in on the relevant evidence quickly, dramatically increasing your analysis speed.

    IBM eDiscovery Manager enables authorized IT and legal staff to search, cull, hold and export case-relevant content to manage electronically stored information (ESI). eDiscovery Manager helps you respond to discovery requests and Streamlines and standardizes the electronic discovery process. It Preserves the electronically stored information (ESI) evidence in a security-rich, auditable, high-scale, trusted evidence repository that includes chain-of-custody tracking and Enhances your capacity to organize ESI, email and other content to reduce discovery costs and risks.
    Sample Customers
    Royal Military Police
    Hansgrohe
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with .

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.