We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and IBM eDiscovery Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."
"Creating and running queries on the solution is very good."
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with .
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.