AccessData FTK [EOL] vs LexisNexis Concordance Classic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and LexisNexis Concordance Classic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use LexisNexis Concordance Classic?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AccessData FTK is too expensive compared to EnCase."
  • More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In eDiscovery
    10th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    337
    Comparisons
    202
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AccessData Forensic Toolkit
    Concordance Classic
    Learn More
    Overview

    FTK is built for speed, stability and ease of use. It provides comprehensive processing and indexing up front, so filtering and searching is faster than with any other product. This means you can zero in on the relevant evidence quickly, dramatically increasing your analysis speed.

    LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
    Sample Customers
    Royal Military Police
    Paralegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 10th in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with IPRO.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.