AccessData Group Summation [EOL] vs IBM eDiscovery Analyzer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData Group Summation [EOL] and IBM eDiscovery Analyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
32nd
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
43
Comparisons
27
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Summation
eDiscovery Analyzer
Learn More
Overview
Litigation software that stores accurate data to be presented in trials, and save money by automating data storage
IBM eDiscovery Analyzer provides first-pass review and conceptual search and analysis of cases created by IBM eDiscovery Manager. eDiscovery Analyzer optimizes your capacity for high-scale, high-volume analysis of electronically stored information (ESI) relating to legal cases. Empower your legal professionals and litigation support specialists to conduct early case assessments. Improve your ability to prepare for meet-and-confer discussions. eDiscovery Analyzer provides a deep understanding of complex legal case evidence earlier. It enhances your overall ability to execute your case strategy while helping to reduce your own legal risks. It Enables deep understanding of behavior patterns, content and conversations with visual evidence analysis to flag, tag and prioritize ESI earlier. Excludes non-responsive content from results and Provides conceptual search, content analysis, similarity and variant analysis. Adds near deduplication and visualization capabilities. Additionally, it Enhances your capacity to provide better security and exert more control over your electronic content. Improves your overall approach to litigation, investigation and audits.
Sample Customers
Archer & Greiner, Bassi Edlin Huie & Blum, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Solomon Ward, AD Triage, Dorsey & Whitney, Shipman & Goodwin,
SIBRA GmbH, IKB
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AccessData Group Summation [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while IBM eDiscovery Analyzer is ranked 32nd in eDiscovery. AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM eDiscovery Analyzer is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM eDiscovery Analyzer is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.