CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] and OpenText AccuRev based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is a lower cost than other top competetors."
  • More OpenText AccuRev Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Views
    216
    Comparisons
    92
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev
    Learn More
    Overview
    CA Application Lifecycle Conductor, creates one view and traceability across the application lifecycle from mobile to mainframe. It improves business agility by removing barriers to faster time to market and improved reliability. With CA ALC, customers can: Establish continuous feedback loops to improve governance, auditability, traceability and Mobile to Mainframe transparency; Simplify and store complex test relationships to automate and speed Mainframe testing; and Coordinate deployment with your preferred Application Release Automation solution to streamline code releases.

    Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while OpenText AccuRev is ranked 23rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText AccuRev is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText AccuRev writes "Good packaging features, but reporting is limited". CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText AccuRev is most compared with Jama Connect.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.