IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Engineering Workflow Management and OpenText AccuRev based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Suvajit Chakraborty
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture.""We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.""Good for managing stories, sprints, hydration and releases.""Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.""All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.""Traceability reporting is inbuilt and includes all your requirements."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pros →

"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost.""The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases.""The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves.""The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

More OpenText AccuRev Pros →

Cons
"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.""Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans.""Lacks ability to customize and reporting can be slow.""The solution is very heavily vendor dependent.""We have encountered issues with stability. We have seen where the entire system kind of goes for a toss when certain people use certain types of queries, which are very costly. Then the system kind of slows down a bit, and we have to monitor it."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Cons →

"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need.""It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available.""What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded.""The pricing should be more competitive."

More OpenText AccuRev Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
  • "It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
  • "It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."
  • More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a lower cost than other top competetors."
  • More OpenText AccuRev Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
    Top Answer:Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    781
    Comparisons
    306
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,076
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    218
    Comparisons
    93
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
    Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

    Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

    Sample Customers
    Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
    Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 14 reviews while OpenText AccuRev is ranked 23rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8, while OpenText AccuRev is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText AccuRev writes "Good packaging features, but reporting is limited". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, GitLab and Polarion ALM, whereas OpenText AccuRev is most compared with .

    We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.