We performed a comparison between Jira and OpenText AccuRev based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."Offers great multiple reporting charts."
"The burndown charts help track projects."
"The most valuable feature is project management."
"Being able to automatize the deployment of the solution has been great."
"The burndown chart is also helpful when it comes to reporting and allows us to know where we are going, especially during development."
"Work management software that has the flexibility to be configured for any company. It's stable, scalable, and offers responsive support."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is that it's a well-known tool that many people are familiar with."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs."
"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."
"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."
"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."
"The user interface and views on different devices should be improved."
"I think that there is some ease of use that could be brought in to improve certain things."
"They could improve the solution by having a multiple project dashboard to be able to manage many projects KPI's at once, this would really be helpful."
"Could be more stable with more integrations."
"We'd like to see Jira have more integration with a development ID."
"Ease of administration and customization. It is really clunky in this area."
"Not very intuitive for project admins."
"The sprint-related graphics need to be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."
"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."
"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."
"The pricing should be more competitive."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 257 reviews while OpenText AccuRev is ranked 23rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Jira is rated 8.2, while OpenText AccuRev is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText AccuRev writes "Good packaging features, but reporting is limited". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas OpenText AccuRev is most compared with Jama Connect.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.