We performed a comparison between ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
More ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is ranked 23rd in Process Automation with 1 review while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub writes "Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.