We performed a comparison between ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
More ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is ranked 23rd in Process Automation with 1 review while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 19th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is rated 8.0, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub writes "Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is most compared with , whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration, OpenText Operations Orchestration and BizTalk Server.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.