We performed a comparison between ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
More ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is ranked 23rd in Process Automation with 1 review while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 8th in Process Automation with 21 reviews. ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is rated 8.0, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub writes "Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is most compared with , whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
