Compare ACL Analytics vs. Workiva

ACL Analytics is ranked 5th in GRC while Workiva is ranked 18th in GRC. ACL Analytics is rated 0, while Workiva is rated 0. On the other hand, ACL Analytics is most compared with SAS Enterprise GRC, RSA Archer and Workiva, whereas Workiva is most compared with RSA Archer, ACL Analytics and SAP BusinessObjects GRC.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ACL Analytics  Logo
2,442 views|617 comparisons
Workiva Logo
510 views|317 comparisons
Ranking
5th
out of 53 in GRC
Views
2,442
Comparisons
617
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
162
Avg. Rating
10.0
18th
out of 53 in GRC
Views
510
Comparisons
317
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Learn
ACL
Workiva
Overview
ACL Analytics connects you to any data source, and lets you run sophisticated risk analytics and detect anomalies or patterns that you simply can't illuminate with any amount of random sampling, spreadsheet ninjutsu or generic business intelligence. It's designed for you, the GRC professional.

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

  • Optimize your structured and composite reports
  • Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
  • Transform processes to enable insight
Offer
Learn more about ACL Analytics
Learn more about Workiva
Sample Customers
Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of FinanceNoodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.