We compared Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud and Druva inSync across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is commended for its simplicity, intuitive management, incremental backups, and proactive defense against ransomware. Druva inSync is praised for its user-friendly interface, adaptability, and automated ransomware detection. It provides cloud accessibility, customizable backup policies, and efficient data recovery.
Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud should focus on enhancing server performance, reporting capabilities, and remote restore capabilities. Users say Druva inSync could improve resource efficiency and enhance security with user-level encryption keys.
Service and Support: Acronis customer service received mixed reviews, with some users expressing dissatisfaction with the level of support received. Druva has been praised for its excellent customer support, with users highlighting the prompt and helpful assistance provided.
Ease of Deployment: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has a simple setup that can be finished within one to two weeks, with deployment times varying based on the chosen modules. The initial setup process for Druva inSync is generally straightforward and can be completed in less than half an hour, but the total deployment time may be longer for complex environments.
Pricing: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud offers different licensing options. Some customers find the cost to be high but manageable. Druva inSync’s pricing is considered simple and inexpensive, with no extra fees or licensing expenses.
ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has demonstrated financial advantages. Users have provided limited information about the ROI of Druva inSync so far.
Comparison Results: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is a simple, user-friendly solution offering advanced features like incremental backups and sophisticated ransomware protection. Still, Acronis has room to improve in areas like performance, reporting, support, and pricing. Druva inSync is regarded as an affordable, adaptable solution that’s effortless to set up. Users love Druva’s automated ransomware capabilities and helpful customer service. Reviews say Druva can improve security by adding user-level encryption, and some complained that the solution is too resource-intensive.
"The agent, which is installed on the system, can do Quality of Service."
"The product is a good anti-ransomware solution."
"The integration with multiple modules in the console and the backup and recovery features are very good."
"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery."
"The disaster recovery feature."
"Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud provides unlimited backup features for Office 365 accounts."
"I have found many of the backup options valuable such as logging the event backup and the ability to run an analysis of the backup before you start for problems."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The tool has good features. The backup is also accurate."
"One of the most valuable features is it is available on the cloud, so I do not need to make a firewall. Second, the backup speed is outstanding. The third thing is that the section policy is very good and gives you a lot of flexibility and granularity regarding what you need to back up."
"You don't need a certified administrator to manage this product."
"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."
"The main benefit of this solution is that it automatically scans the files for ransomware after the backup is complete."
"Druva inSync is very easy to use."
"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."
"It's incredibly fast."
"Slow response from technical support."
"The logs could be better. Logs through the website are just too simple and basic."
"One of the areas where the product could be improved is its online cloud backup. I do appreciate the way the product is easy to navigate, however, sometimes I have difficulty managing the security permissions on my backups."
"They should integrate the solution with Storage Area Network(SAN)."
"The shortcomings in the solution can be overcome if the product improves in the area of completion time so that the restoration process does not take much time."
"For you to actually see the full logs, you have to use additional tools or even contact support so they can pull them with own tools."
"I would like to see more integration with SIEM solutions."
"I would like to have support for agentless backup, where you don't have to install an agent on the host."
"The solution takes a lot of time during restoration."
"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of an on-premise backup feature, as currently, they are offering everything in the cloud."
"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."
"I would like to see security improved in the next release."
"The speed could be better."
"Druva inSync is very high in price. A general customer cannot afford this solution. Even if the product is good, people cannot afford such a high cost just for taking the backup. This is a recurring investment, and the customers have to pay for it every year. Druva is also yet to develop the channel and the channel or partner commitment."
"The product needs to improve its support."
"The backup time is very poor. The backup runs continuously. It goes on from morning till night. The system performance also becomes very poor when Druva inSync is running."
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is ranked 10th in Cloud Backup with 41 reviews while Druva inSync is ranked 15th in Cloud Backup with 13 reviews. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is rated 8.6, while Druva inSync is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud writes "A solution that unites backup and next-generation, AI-based anti-malware, antivirus, and endpoint protection management in one solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Druva inSync writes "Excellent cloud based functionality, highly reliable, with high speed and flexibility". Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, AWS Backup, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Veeam Backup & Replication and N-able Cove Data Protection, whereas Druva inSync is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and Commvault Cloud. See our Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. Druva inSync report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
