We performed a comparison between Acronis Disaster Recovery and N2WS Backup & Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Acronis Disaster Recovery has good scalability."
"Our customers use Acronis Disaster Recovery for data backup."
"The solution can be improved by including a load balancer."
"One key feature is it encrypts your data at rest which is really good."
"The backup and recovery options work flawlessly."
"Performance-wise, it works efficiently for backup and recovery compared to other tools."
"The most valuable features of the product for me are its backup and recovery functionalities."
"The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost."
"N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The product is successful with the SMB market."
"Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The backup and restore functionality is very easy to use and manage."
"The backup and recovery are the most valuable features. So, our developers can work with confidence."
"The product should improve compute points."
"The cost is acceptable."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery should provide software information wherein I can change my setup to collect more information."
"I wish the Disaster Recovery system could do more, like integrating irregularity features and combining VLP functionalities."
"They could provide pricing models considering the requirements of various countries and organizations."
"The documentation can be improved, this would have helped."
"In the future, I would like to see cross-platform support."
"It's a global feature that the customer thinks they don't have enough tools to manage, to copy, to delay, and to classify the object file in the backup directory. So they need more tools to manage files in object directory."
"Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud."
"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."
"The GUI could be slightly improved."
"The GUI has room for improvement."
"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."
"The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want."
"There is room for improvement in stability."
Acronis Disaster Recovery is ranked 18th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 9 reviews while N2WS Backup & Recovery is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 8 reviews. Acronis Disaster Recovery is rated 8.4, while N2WS Backup & Recovery is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Acronis Disaster Recovery writes "A great solution for running into data centers or full-location data centers for our customers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N2WS Backup & Recovery writes "The backup and recovery are its most valuable features. However, the UI is a bit dated". Acronis Disaster Recovery is most compared with Arcserve UDP, Veeam Backup & Replication and Azure Site Recovery, whereas N2WS Backup & Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, AWS Backup, Rubrik, Clumio and Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365. See our Acronis Disaster Recovery vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
