Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] vs Flux comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Acronis Logo
views| comparisons
Flux Logo
82 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] and Flux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Acronis Files Cloud [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Ranking
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
82
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Acronis File Sync and Share
Learn More
Overview

Designed exclusively for Service Providers, Acronis Files Cloud delivers safe mobile file access, sync, and share in a simple, complete, and secure hosted cloud solution.

Acronis Files Cloud - An easy-to-use file, sync, and share (FSS) solution designed with your customer’s security and privacy in mind. A safe choice given Acronis’ proven AnyData Engine and years of data protection expertise. Launch quickly with zero entry costs and a per-use business model Provides multi-tier, multitenant flexible services. Acronis Files Cloud provides APIs to connect to your existing business systems.

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

Sample Customers
University of East Anglia, Rust-Oleum, Government of Basel-Stadt, Forward, University of Central Lancashire Learning and Information Services, Malmberg Uitgevery, Bokf_rlaget Natur & Kultur, QuadGraphics, United States Department of Agriculture, Parrish Construction Group
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise80%
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Flux is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.