Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] vs Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] and Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We are paying around 30K per year."
  • "It is much more competitively priced. Axway is probably three or four times more expensive than Globalscape. I like the server-based license. It's easier to manage than a seat license, which our previous product Axway had. Axway's license model is to charge by the account while Globalscape's model is by the server. It is much simpler and much easier when audit time comes."
  • "A large factor in our decision to go with Globalscape was the price."
  • "It is a very good product in terms of purchase. It didn't cost that much, even with the way we had scaled and architecturally put things in place. It is definitely comparable to other products."
  • "Globalscape is not cheap, but you get what you pay for. The cost is worth the value of the product. What you're getting is a good, stable solution that does a lot."
  • "Maintenance and services for Globalscape EFT have an annual price tag, and it is not cheap."
  • "The on-prem licensing is very good. It's a perpetual license and I would advise others to purchase that license. That way, you don't have to pay yearly."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced in comparison to other products."
  • More Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It bolsters security with features like Data Loss Prevention and seamless integration with DLP for a safe and compliant environment which enables real-time document sharing and control over file… more »
    Top Answer:It offers excellent value and its pricing is straightforward, making it easy to acquire, set up, and use. While there are some areas where it could improve, such as GUI and collaboration features, the… more »
    Top Answer:It could improve its operations by incorporating real-time collaboration features like those offered by platforms such as Microsoft OneDrive and Office 365. These features include tracking changes… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    1,246
    Comparisons
    715
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    913
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Acronis File Sync and Share
    Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer
    Learn More
    Fortra
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Designed exclusively for Service Providers, Acronis Files Cloud delivers safe mobile file access, sync, and share in a simple, complete, and secure hosted cloud solution.

    Acronis Files Cloud - An easy-to-use file, sync, and share (FSS) solution designed with your customer’s security and privacy in mind. A safe choice given Acronis’ proven AnyData Engine and years of data protection expertise. Launch quickly with zero entry costs and a per-use business model Provides multi-tier, multitenant flexible services. Acronis Files Cloud provides APIs to connect to your existing business systems.

    Globalscape is consistently recognized for providing top-notch solutions for securing and automating file transfers for Windows-centric organizations. 

    Sample Customers
    University of East Anglia, Rust-Oleum, Government of Basel-Stadt, Forward, University of Central Lancashire Learning and Information Services, Malmberg Uitgevery, Bokf_rlaget Natur & Kultur, QuadGraphics, United States Department of Agriculture, Parrish Construction Group
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is ranked 12th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 10 reviews. Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer writes "Rock solid, secure, and excellent price and quality of service". Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is most compared with MOVEit, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, WS_FTP Server, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer and JSCAPE by Redwood.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.