We performed a comparison between Actian Ingres and ELK Kibana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."The deployment of our solution across a number of servers using Ingres .NET has meant that we can protect the database server behind a highly secure firewall and deploy the front end solutions on a normal web server."
"The optimization and flexibility of visualization tools."
"Having a tool where you can find logs that were generated months ago, and being able to search over a long period of time, is great."
"The automatic update of the graphs from a dashboard is very convenient."
"The ability to reset the log file without stopping the DBMS would be helpful for us."
"Having a kind of wizard that would help you when you are typing your search would make it easier and quicker to refine your search, and ultimately find what you are looking for."
"Security could be improved thereby avoiding the necessity of a third party plugin."
"This solution should allow the user to combine two indices into one graph."
Actian Ingres is ranked 52nd in Data Visualization while ELK Kibana doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Visualization. Actian Ingres is rated 9.0, while ELK Kibana is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Actian Ingres writes "Good multi-platform SQL compatibility, as well as performance and data integrity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ELK Kibana writes "Visualization tools are optimized providing us with increased flexibility". Actian Ingres is most compared with Snowflake, Oracle Database Appliance, Databricks and Teradata, whereas ELK Kibana is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security.
See our list of best Data Visualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
