We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"In order to meet the new trend of active metadata management, we need intelligent APIs that can retrieve new data designs and trigger actions over new findings without human intervention."
"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
Earn 20 points
Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse and webMethods Integration Server.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
