We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"I would like for them to work in real-time."
Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
