• Home
  • Actian Versant FastObjects vs. ENEA Polyhedra

Actian Versant FastObjects vs ENEA Polyhedra comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
4th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
202
Comparisons
132
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
59
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Versant FastObjects
Polyhedra
Learn More
Actian
Video Not Available
ENEA
Overview
FastObjects Client-Server Database is a high performance, transactional object client-server database designed to meet the requirements of object oriented programmers with a need to manage application objects with a robust embedded client-server database. FastObjects Client-Server Database is configurable to meet multi-user requirements as well as embedded client-server database deployment requirements.
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
Sample Customers
Acme Truck Line Inc, Medical Data Vision, Pediatrix Medical Group, Zoho
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD

Actian Versant FastObjects is ranked 4th in Non-Relational Databases while ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases. Actian Versant FastObjects is rated 0.0, while ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Actian Versant FastObjects is most compared with Actian NoSQL Object Database, whereas ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.