We performed a comparison between Forter and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
"The alerts are the most valuable feature because we have different alerts. Different data is fed to Actimize. It alerts us if a transaction happened from a certain place."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"It's a very good case management system."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"Its user interface could be better."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
"This solution is unnecessarily complex."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Forter is ranked 10th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. Forter is rated 9.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forter writes "Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". Forter is most compared with Riskified, Signifyd, Sift Digital Trust and Safety, Kount and ThreatMetrix, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
