Actional vs BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
186 views|147 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
BMC Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL]?
Ranking
Views
186
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BMC Boundary, TrueSight Pulse
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
TrueSight Pulse responds to fluid IT demands with SaaS-based monitoring for real-time visibility into web-scale application metrics helping DevOps teams detect and diagnose problems fast.
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
BeenVerified CraftJack Expedia InterviewStream Jive Rackspace SriptRock
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.