Actional vs IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository?
Ranking
9th
out of 13 in SOA Governance
Views
51
Comparisons
41
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
out of 13 in SOA Governance
Views
61
Comparisons
41
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository provides service registry and repository functions for service-oriented architecture (SOA), enterprise applications for SOAP and REST services. It enables service lifecycle governance to help optimize productivity and resources in an SOA environment.
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
ZAO Raiffeisenbank

Actional is ranked 9th in SOA Governance while IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is ranked 7th in SOA Governance. Actional is rated 9.0, while IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is most compared with .

See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.