Compare Actional vs. IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
8th
out of 15 in SOA Governance
Views
270
Comparisons
195
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
11th
out of 15 in SOA Governance
Views
67
Comparisons
40
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
Learn
Aurea
IBM
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository provides service registry and repository functions for service-oriented architecture (SOA), enterprise applications for SOAP and REST services. It enables service lifecycle governance to help optimize productivity and resources in an SOA environment.
Offer
Learn more about Actional
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom MortgageZAO Raiffeisenbank
Actional is ranked 8th in SOA Governance while IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is ranked 11th in SOA Governance. Actional is rated 0.0, while IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Actional is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is most compared with .

See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.