• Home
  • Actional vs. Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Actional vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo

Actional

Read 2 Actional reviews
186 views|147 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Riverbed Logo

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 10 Aternity AppInternals [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and Aternity AppInternals [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool
Anonymous User
Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable.
Cuts down on the time to resolve complicated application issues. We have been able to trace individual transactions to identify where the issue is... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
  • "The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

    • More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    72nd
    out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    186
    Comparisons
    147
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Riverbed
    Overview
    Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.

    Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

    Sample Customers
    Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
    National Instruments, Allianz
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Government14%
    Media Company14%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Actional is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Aternity AppInternals [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aternity AppInternals [EOL] writes "We use it to see the experience of users hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is most compared with IDERA Precise.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.