Compare ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. Aspera On Demand

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Aspera On Demand? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.""I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market.""It allows for lower operational overhead.""Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

More ActiveBatch Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform… more »
Top Answer: The cost is outside the scope of my job responsibilities. Obviously we're using it, so it was worth the cost. I think it's a tremendous product. I don't know what the cost is compared to others, but… more »
Top Answer: It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
Views
1,961
Comparisons
940
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,872
Avg. Rating
9.1
16th
Views
526
Comparisons
416
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
ActiveBatch
Learn
Advanced Systems Concepts
IBM
Overview

Orchestrate your entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation and Enterprise Job Scheduling. Build and centralize end-to-end workflows under a single pane of glass. Seamlessly manage systems, applications, and services across your organization. Eliminate manual workflows with ActiveBatch so you can focus on higher value activities that drive your company forward.

Limitless Endpoints: Use native integrations and our low-code REST API adapter to connect to any server, any application, any service.

Proactive Support Model: 24/7- US-based support and predictive diagnostics.

Low Code Drag-and-Drop GUI: Easily build reliable, customizable, end-to-end processes.

Aspera On Demand is a product offering from Aspera that provides access to Aspera’s patented FASP high-speed transfer software and solutions, as part of an online usage-based subscription service. Unlike on-premise deployments where you, the customer, must provision the underlying infrastructure, Aspera On Demand runs on cloud-based infrastructure provided by a cloud computing provider. You gain the benefits of Aspera high-speed transfer without large upfront infrastructure costs to support it. This offering is available today on the Amazon Web Services, IBM Softlayer Cloud, Google Cloud and on the Microsoft Windows Azure cloud platforms. Support for other cloud platforms and types of services will be available in the future.

Offer
Learn more about ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Learn more about Aspera On Demand
Sample Customers
Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's HospitalDeluxe Digital Studios, BT, The European Space Agency, GigaScience, Groupe AB
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company50%
Leisure / Travel Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Renewables & Environment Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Insurance Company11%
University7%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Government22%
Media Company17%
Comms Service Provider14%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise44%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ActiveBatch Workload Automation is ranked 2nd in Managed File Transfer with 7 reviews while Aspera On Demand is ranked 16th in Managed File Transfer. ActiveBatch Workload Automation is rated 9.2, while Aspera On Demand is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ActiveBatch Workload Automation writes "Provides critical functionality in moving from our mainframe to a distributed environment". On the other hand, ActiveBatch Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Automic Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center and Tidal Automation, whereas Aspera On Demand is most compared with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, AWS Transfer for SFTP, Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer, Accellion and HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.